CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF

March 8th, 2010

Seems simple enough, doesn’t it?  You don’t even need aviation experience and you know what that means.  That clearance, delivered by a youngster to a commercial aircraft, has unleashed a storm of complaint across the country.

Days ago, an Air Traffic Controller at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York, brought his young son to work with him and allowed him to issue that clearance.  The next day, he brought his young daughter to work and she had a similar opportunity.  You would think global aviation safety had been compromised given the unleashing of media coverage, and the controller waits as his fate is considered by the Federal Aviation Administration.

As a twenty-plus year private pilot, and father of four sons who have all done the same thing as these two New York kids, I am stunned at the over-reaction to this non-event.  My two older boys, when they were in their early teens, accompanied me to Boston Center, the FAA facility on Rte. 3 in Nashua, NH, where a friend of mine was a senior controller and manager.  They each were allowed to issue a benign clearance to a commercial jet.  “Cactus 121, climb and maintain 35,000…”.  The reply, in old-salt pilot parlance, “roger that Boston, Cactus 121 climb and maintain 350…” .  I still remember it.  You would have thought they had talked to God.  Both pilots, like the ones days ago in New York, not only took it in stride, but seemed a little lightened by it.  No surprise.

Aviation is an American institution that is rooted…rooted in, the fascination of youngsters in the wonder of flight.  I bet I don’t know a single pilot who didn’t spend a little of their childhood clinging to a chainlink fence at a small airfield somewhere in America.  Back then, stories of washing airplanes in exchange for a ride were commonplace.  Even now, at Boire Field in Nashua where I fly, a kid doesn’t have to hang around too long on a sunny Saturday afternoon, with too much of a forlorn look on his face, before someone is going to offer him a hop around the patch.

In over twenty years of flying, my greatest joy is bringing young people up for their first flight, and maybe a few minutes at the controls.  I’ll know right off, depending on their response, if they’re going to catch “the bug”.  No thought pleases me more than to think that, years from now, when that young kid, now a young man receiving his “certificate” (license), may remember his flight with me as the catalyst that sent him off on a lifelong romance with aviation.  I remember flying with my father and his instructor, Harvey Sawyer of the Silver Ranch Airport in Jaffrey, NH.  My father soloed but never went on to get his ticket, but I knew then that someday, I would fly airplanes.

The controller in New York is undoubtedly proud of his job, as he should be, and wanted to let his kids see…for just one day, what exactly he does at work.  What an invigorating, exciting and bracing job, watching and controlling airplanes in and around JFK Airport, with a view that is unrivaled and only a few will ever see at all.  Are we so tight now that we can’t allow a kid a chance, with father and controller by his side, to clear an airplane for takeoff?  C’mon.  I’ve listened to people on talk radio for days now excoriating this controller.  Lighten up.  This is how kids learn, get enthused, dream and grow.  It isn’t all about the classroom.

More importantly, if the flying public wants someone to get mad at…try the FAA itself, which will use this “incident” as a podium to demonstrate to the public how serious they are about safety.  What people don’t know, is that the FAA routinely denies safety recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board, year after year. decade after decade.  From the fuel tank explosion that took down TWA Flight 700 over Long Island Sound, to the events leading up to the ValuJet crash into the Everglades,both crashes caused by problems the NTSB had warned about years earlier, the FAA is always putting airline finances above passenger safety, time after time after time.

The FAA might trouble itself with keeping “kids” from flying commercial airplanes, like the two horrendously under-experienced pilots who crashed the Continental flight in Buffalo,NY last year.  Flew an approach through bad weather, knew they were picking up ice, and when the airplane finally stalled, the pilot pulled back on the stick instead of applying full power with stick forward.  Exactly the wrong input and everyone on board died.  The “time-in-type” and minimum experience requirements, along with pay, have dwindled to the point where pilots beginning the climb up the ladder to “Captain” may not even be shaving yet.  I’ve seen Captains on commercial flights I’ve taken that looked like Doogie Howser, like someone’s nephew was flying the plane.  I still prefer to see a little gray hair, or a bald spot, in the left seat.  There are old pilots, and there are bold pilots, but there are no old, bold pilots.

The rest of the world can mamby-pamby itself into a sterile white room where nothing bad ever happens, but I will choose to take as big a bite of the apple as I can, and I hope my kids will too.  Life is about experiences, and experiences shape who we are and influence which and how many doors will open along our journey through life.  I salute the controller who took his kids to work.  Look…if that was where I worked…I would have a new guest everyday because let’s face it…that’s a really cool job!

RECONCILING

March 1st, 2010

Wow…there’s one of those words.  “Reconcile”.  Many uses.  It usually brings my checkbook to mind, and the arduous monthly task of “reconciling” the account.  For obsessive-compulsives like me it can be heart wrenching.  It’s got to match to the penny.  The second thing that pops into my mind is the use of the word in the context of relationships.  Reconciling after an argument or break-up.  It doesn’t happen often these days, or too often the “reconciliation” is delivered via a sawed-off shotgun.

The sawed-off shotgun analogy works best with the current reconciliation effort underway in Washington, D.C. .  In an effort to plow through the wildly unpopular health care reform legislation, the Obama administration is considering use of a process called, oddly enough, “reconciliation”.  It is a rarely used twisting of the voting rules used in the United States Senate, that allows for a bill to be passed with less votes.  In this case, 51 instead of 60.

The thing is, it is usually reserved for, and supposed to be reserved for, budget crises that demand federal borrowing that would normally be forbidden.  The democrats are ready, willing and able to use the tool to win some sort of health care reform bill, come Hell or high water.  It has been fascinating watching the gyrations.  In the wake of the Scott Brown victory, the message from Capital Hill was that patience would rule, more discussion and bi-partisan efforts were needed.  That didn’t last long.

With Obama’s approval ratings winning the Gold in downhill, there is an impending sense of urgency as November creeps closer and closer.  Obama has chosen, apparently, the “Thelma and Louise” approach here, choosing to accept his one-term fate, accepting his second two years in office as most likely being seriously hampered by the results of the mid term elections, and putting pedal to the metal and heading straight for the cliff.

They can’t possibly not know what will happen if they ram this through.  Close to two thirds of the country is against it, or at least against it in the middle of a deep recession.  Yet this President seems oddly unmoved by that overwhelming sentiment.  It has seemed, even since he took office, that this health care bill is the only issue for which he has heart.  He just can’t seem to connect with middle-America.  We are unemployed.  Our futures are more uncertain than at any other time in our memories.  Hard working folks who have taken pride in making their own way, in not reaching out for help, are more and more incensed with the notion that what little they have left, should be given to the government to distribute to the less fortunate.

Maybe that’s the rub right there.  The “less fortunate”.  Too often, the folks who need the hand out are not at all less fortunate, but are simply folks who have chosen not to strive in a nation that was built on, and by, strivers.  I don’t know a decent person who is not willing and wanting to help anyone who is truly in need.  Someone who has fallen on hard times, by circumstance or even in the wake of one’s own mistakes.  Yet I know a lot of people who are reticent to just keep shelling it out to a government that seems to have no lucid pre-qualifications for receiving other people’s money.

I’m in the dirt business for almost thirty years now.  Never taken the handout.  This time of year, it is not unusual to work all day, then climb into a different piece of equipment and plow snow for another 24 hours.  It’s not unusual to work in excess of 36 or 48 hours without sleep.  I’m not the only one.  Lots of Americans work that hard.  We do it to provide more for our families, to perhaps set aside for retirement, or college for the kids.  But I don’t do it so I can send a check to someone else who is not willing to try.  Hence, the Tea Party movement.  Hence…lots of angry Americans.  It’s so simple, and yet our President is so disconnected he doesn’t understand it.  He doesn’t understand why we don’t want to pay millions to try terrorists in New York City.  They may not do it…but that doesn’t change the fact that he wanted to, and doesn’t understand why it is so wrong.

Reconcile?  I wouldn’t count on it.  Should the democrats decide to run the table and push through an almost incomprehensible piece of legislation, the reconciliation is going to come in the form of a complete overhaul of both Houses in November.  It may happen anyway, but it will surely happen if they decide to simply change the voting rules so as to secure the outcome they desire.  That’s not a democracy…that’s an oligarchy.

UNHINGED

February 22nd, 2010

The latest act by another disenfranchised citizen has come in the form of a small plane being crashed into the Internal Revenue Service building in Austin, Texas.  The resultant fire spread quickly through the entire building and it is a miracle that only one person inside was killed.  Sadly, he was a well-liked family man, a Vietnam Veteran, and known to all as one who would be the first to offer aid to anyone in need.  Isn’t that always the way it goes?  The pilot, Joseph Stack, an unemployed civil engineer who was unraveling over the past weeks, also died in the crash.  That part, of course, is as it should be.

What, exactly, is this ever-increasing act of violence that includes taking innocent people with you during your self-imposed “flame-of-glory” exit?  Family murder-suicides are rising dramatically, now often based in financial stress that finally reaches the breaking point.  A pure litmus test of the degree of stress that many families are feeling, and when it comes to the point where you’re losing, or are about to lose, everything, we are seeing that those who are even slightly pre-disposed to “snapping” are doing so at an alarming rate.

Even in our tiny state of New Hampshire there has been a spate of murder-suicides in neighborhoods, and involving families, that you wouldn’t expect to see that kind of violent end.  Even Stack, lit his house on fire, family still inside, before he left for the airport for his final flight.  Why he did not simply fly himself into the side of a mountain is beyond me, but like many before him, he decided to take, or try to take, a few along with him.

Are there any among us who are not frustrated with our tax bills and the obscene spending by our elected officials, while our struggle to keep our homes and keep our families fed becomes more and more difficult?  Still, have you ever considered such an outrageous act?  Did Joseph Stack give any consideration to the aftermath of his attack, to the damage done to innocents? My first thought was…”the guy owns an airplane…things can’t be that bad…”, and yet that irony seemed lost on him.

Workplace murder is common, let’s be honest, as are school shootings.  Let’s brace ourselves for the “normalization” of the notion that an increasing number of us will become unhinged and commit some heinous act.  We seem to take it in stride as a culture.  Remember Timothy McVeigh?  Similar story.  We become the enemy when we allow ourselves to become terrorists, and if the rest of us, as a society, continue to ignore warning signs amongst friends and neighbors, than we can expect the trend to continue to fester unabated.  To think you can go through life, one tumbler click away from shooting your co-workers or flying a plane into a building, and none of your friends or family notices something is wrong, seems unlikely to me, but we are loathe to speak up and unsure when or what to do other than that.

I’m not looking forward to a world where we have to avoid the unhinged in the same way we watch for children when a ball rolls in front of you while driving.  I’ve got enough to worry about…or then again…maybe I don’t.

AND THE OSCAR GOES TO….

February 14th, 2010

Hopefully, not you, if you’re a patient at the Steere Nursing Home in Providence, Rhode Island.  I’m not talking about the prestigious award given to actors and actresses of high rank.  I’m talking about a different Oscar.  Oscar the Death Cat.

For quite some time Oscar has held the fascination of doctors and scientists for his uncanny ability to sense impending death. Indeed, Dr. David Dosa, a professor at Brown University Medical School, wrote a piece about Oscar in 2007 in The New England Journal of Medicine.  Oscar is drawn to the bedside of patients about to die, usually within an hour or two of their demise.  His batting average is about 98%.  Certainly, an intriguing little kitty.

There was the time that nursing home staff were sure a patient was about to meet his maker, and they placed Oscar on his bed.  Oscar, though, would not stay put and it turned out that the patient rallied for several days.  Then, an hour before passing, Oscar joined the man, curled up at his side.  Other similar stories abound.

One must wonder, though, how do they keep the business coming in at this place?  I would think that the nursing home chapter of one’s life is rather grim enough, without having Dr. Kevorkian’s cat gnawing at your door all night.  And the idea that staff would bring this corpse-inducing beast into your room, seemingly hoping that you will die soon, seems contrary to common sense.  Aren’t they supposed to be keeping people comfortable?  How do you get comfortable with this creepy cat curled up at your feet?  Is there nobody in the neighborhood with a can of tuna that could lure this creature away from the building?

I understand the fascination, but at some point you would think they might get a little sheepish about it.  I mean, these doctors and scientists running around with clipboards and sketch pads, meanwhile, this place has more chalk outlines than Einstein’s first blackboard.  Patients must avoid tuna sandwiches like the plague.  Anything that smells remotely like catnip is out of the question.  Speaking for myself, I would have a hungry German Sheppard tied to my bedpost.

Dr. Dosa remarked that Oscar was helpful in that staff could notify relatives early.  I’m serious.  Who makes that call, and how exactly does that go?  “Why don’t you warm up the car, Oscar is sleeping on your uncle’s head…”  Or, maybe, the staff simply calls and whispers “meow” into the phone.

I’m going on record right now, to my friends and family.  Should I make it to the nursing home, make sure it is a home with a zero-tolerance “No Pets” policy.

POMP AND CIRCUMSTANCE

February 8th, 2010

Anyone remember Thurston Howell III from Gilligan’s Island?  Jim Backus was the actor, I believe, and much like our President he spoke with his chin elevated and with that elegant, aristocratic drawl that is so often used to mock the dialect of the inexplicably wealthy.  Backus’ character and his wife, were the wealthy couple in the cast of misfits shipwrecked on a deserted island.  Constantly put upon by the lack of amenities and comforts, luxuries and pleasures that they had become accustomed to.

If only Backus had lived long enough to become Speaker of the House.  He would have found himself having to adjust to the excessive showering of amenities, comforts, luxuries and pleasures bestowed upon him.  Our beloved Speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has recently had unearthed to the public her penchant for no-holds-barred travel on military aircraft, most notably the gorgeous and opulent Gulfstream IV.  Any pilot, myself included, genuflects in awe at the passing of a G-5 either on ground or in air, because they are the Rolls Royce of corporate air travel.

Pelosi, it seems, likes to block one off for her own use nearly every weekend.  Indeed, emails from military personnel at Travis AFB where the Gulfstreams are based, contained complaints regarding Pelosi’s heavy use of the aircraft.  “She blocks one off for the weekend, and then cancels at the last minute, as one might do with a car service.  We have crews drive in, caterers deliver food, pre-flights performed on aircraft…and then she cancels.”  Sounds like a dream, doesn’t she?

It doesn’t end there, though.  Our mouse-like Speaker has spent over 2 million dollars of our tax money on private air-taxi service in just two years.  She has spent over 100 thousand dollars on food and booze. Think about it…$1,000. every week.  The list of liquors reads like something from a high-end Manhattan club.  Fine cognacs and vodkas and brandy.  Only the best.  On over a third of the flights she had family members on board.  How impressive she is, commanding such service from the underlings.  Imagine, having a Gulfstream at your disposal, and yet being so intellectually inept, that you don’t even consider the cost and inconvenience of having one “on hold” every single weekend, “just in case”, I suppose.

I don’t know about you, but the thought of my tax dollars being spent on as much as a single peanut for that abhorrent woman just makes my blood boil.  In her usual dismissive style, her response to the release of this information is that her “use of military aircraft is in line with what other Speakers have done.”  Fantastic.  Let’s just hope and pray that prior behavior of politicians does not become the universal benchmark for the rest of us.  Can anyone say “John Edwards”?  “Hey, the last guy that ran for President also had a little action on the side while his wife was battling cancer, extorted money from the aptly named Bunny Mellon to keep his girlfriend in clover, and then paid a sycophant-aide to take the fall for him…so…why shouldn’t I do it?”

The reason, Minnie Pelosi, is that Americans have had it up to here (I’m holding my hand just below my nose) with the cavalier spending by government and government officials.  While telling the rest of us to continue “tightening our belts”, until our legs are pinched off, apparently, their spending continues to expand and grow like a mutant octopus.  Pelosi, ever-watchful of the less fortunate, seems able to forget their plight with ease as soon as the gear goes up on her G-5.  Well, let me correct myself there…”our G-5″.  Let’s not forget, dear, that those aircraft were bought and paid for by the American people with money borrowed from the Chinese, and we want some respect.  We also would like to see a rapid decompression under her seat, but hey…you can’t have everything.  Unless your name is Nancy Pelosi.

WHEN LESS IS MORE

February 1st, 2010

As a young musician playing in a band I remember being told that “less is more”.  In other words, it wasn’t the quantity, but the quality of what you were playing that was important.  I’m sure there are other analogies, but generally speaking, from a mathematical standpoint, less can’t be more, or it wouldn’t be “less” in the first place.  My head hurts.

And your head will hurt, too, if you keep reading.  In Portland, Maine, businesses are outraged that after having been regulated into using less electricity, to diminish their corporate “carbon footprint”, they found themselves in a different rate group with their providers and ultimately were paying more money for less electricity.   Ouch!  Talk about cruel irony.  It’s hard to imagine that in this dire time for the economy, when most businesses are struggling to remain afloat, that having to pay a higher electric bill for less product would be met with much enthusiasm.  And it wasn’t.

I’ve written before that I believe a cleaner planet is a better planet.  I believe, pragmatically, that it is not beyond belief that “man” has impacted the environment negatively.  Just the burning of fossil fuels over the last hundred or so years, at such an enormous rate, could plausibly, in my humble opinion, have some detrimental effect to our environment.  Call me a nut.

However I don’t buy into the global warming hysteria, nor do I subscribe to any political affiliation that demands I adhere to a pre-determined position.  I don’t believe the argument is strengthened either way when it becomes a political football.  Political footballs don’t move, they hover.  Nothing ever gets agreed upon, and consequently solutions are rarely manifest.

The case in Maine, though, demonstrates how knee-jerk policy often comes back to bite you in the buttocks.  It reminds us how the electric companies weren’t born yesterday, and are already anticipating ways to maintain revenue levels in a world where everyone is being told to “use less”.  There isn’t a father or husband in the world, including me, who is not well versed in the flamingo-like dance of running around the house turning lights out behind other occupants who are less familiar with the electric bill.  Still, on a global level, solid solutions come from reasoned thought that already considered things like “rate groups” and “unintended consequences”.

Another example of bitten buttocks comes in the form of the increasingly popular LED traffic signals.  They look nice.  They are brighter and use much less electricity to operate than the old-fashioned traffic lights.  They also don’t emit any heat, like a regular bulb, and this created problems in parts of the country where snow and ice are part of the weather menu.  During snow storms, the lights became covered with snow and ice and completely ineffectual.  So, in many towns and states that found themselves with these lights at hundreds of intersections, public works and highway crews were forced to go around to these lights during bad weather, and thaw them out with heaters from a bucket truck.  In some areas, they installed small make-shift heaters to keep the lights from icing over.  In other places, they undertook the more (though not much more) humiliating task of replacing the units altogether with…you guessed it…the old ones.  Consider the energy wasted, the muddy “carbon footprint”, as a result of hundreds of utility trucks and crews having to be dispatched to “thaw traffic lights” every time there was inclement weather and the temperature was below freezing.  What’s the old saying about cutting off your nose?

There is something to be learned here and most of us learned it in kindergarten.  Someone wrote a story about it involving a tortoise and a hare.  I’m not sure that book is still available, or if PETA has had it removed from libraries as it depicts turtles as slow-moving, but smart, and rabbits as fast, but not all that bright.  From a pet’s standpoint, it uses the worst stereotypes imaginable, but if you can find a copy it’s worth the read if only for the valuable lesson.  And read it slowly.  Haste makes waste.

THE GOLD RUSH

January 25th, 2010

One hand giveth, the other taketh away.  That’s how I’m feeling after days of euphoria following the victory of Scott Brown over Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts special election.  A stunning upset that finally tells the world, or more importantly, the Obama administration, that the Tea Party movement is not imaginary.  It’s not a bunch of rednecks, it’s not a bunch of angry republicans…it’s working-class Americans saying “enough is enough”.

What could be more demonstrative of that fact than a republican winning Ted Kennedy’s seat?  I know, I know, it’s the people’s seat, as Scott Brown reminded us during his debate with the diminutive Martha Coakley.  Better yet, he went on to prove it with a solid win that came with margins that made stealing the election impossible for the corrupt political machine of that state.  Senator Scott Brown, in my humble opinion, may be one of the best things to happen to this country in a long time.  It was more than refreshing to hear him in Washington, speaking in decisive, clear tones and articulating the simple rules of the game that most of us would like to see implemented in our Federal Government.  Fiscal responsibility being first and foremost.

Just as I was beginning to wonder if the euphoric feeling would ever subside, the Supreme Court stepped in and squashed it for me with their ruling last week regarding some of the basic tenets of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill.  The legislation, originally intended to squeeze corruption from the political donation process, enraged most republicans and further distanced McCain from his party when he introduced it.  We all say we want politicians who “get things done” and who “reach across the aisle” and who “compromise in an effort to produce actual legislation”, but be careful if you are a politician who actually does any of those things.

Remember when McCain called for the troop surge in Iraq?  This was not a popular notion at the time and his fellow republicans ran in the other direction, but McCain was right.  He put what was best for the country ahead of his own political ambitions, an act that is as rare in Washington, D.C. as are Polar Bear sightings in Hawaii.

McCain-Feingold was no exception.  Republicans cried “foul” and felt that free speech was being squashed.  I find that argument ridiculous and invite anybody to find me one person in this country who is not free to speak his or her mind, on any subject, in any media, with fear of repercussion.  I mean, really…look at what transpires in this country.  We have everything and anything available to us 24/7, every conceivable type of information or opinion.  The argument that Free Speech as guaranteed to us in the Constitution, was somehow taken away or diminished by not allowing corporations, groups or lobbyists to offer huge donations to political campaigns, seems ludicrous to me.

I don’t necessarily want Boeing, AIG, or Wal-Mart to have a bigger voice than the rest of us.  But it wasn’t about that, anyway, and we all know it.  It was about big donations being rewarded with big federal contracts and politicians being paid off for the favor.  We all know that.  We all know what McCain-Feingold was meant to do.  We all know why republicans hated it.  It was killing the cash cow, the goose that laid the golden eggs, and again, when it comes down to cash or character, most politicians will take the cash and compromise their character.

I laugh at the people I hear celebrating this ruling as some kind of victory.  It’s like the chickens celebrating a new dental plan for the fox.  Watch now, as the river of corrupt money again floods the political process.  The very last thing we need right now, and it is odd, also, that the Supreme Court seemed to have missed the “Scott heard ’round the world” from Massachusetts.  Let’s see who, during the mid-terms and the campaign of 2012, takes the big money, and how they pay back that favor if and when elected.  Then, put a little star next to their name…and make sure they get booted out next time around, as is about to happen to most of Congress this Fall.

WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU?

January 18th, 2010

Probably more than you think.  I’m not talking about that popular parcel delivery service with the brown trucks that park in the middle of the road, I’m talking Scott Brown of Massachusetts who is the talk of the country, and for good reason.

The coveted U.S. Senate seat left vacant after the passing of Ted Kennedy, and widely assumed to be promptly filled by another well-heeled political hack from the political hack Center of The Universe, Massachusetts, is suddenly in jeopardy.  To the utter dismay of hard-core Massachusetts democrats, the campaign of Attorney General Martha Coakley, is in shambles and by Tuesday night we’ll know just how bad.  This doesn’t mean she’s going to lose, although I hope so, but even if she wins, the campaign has been a train wreck, and the fact that she didn’t simply walk away with the election, as most people expected, has shaken the National Democratic Committee to it’s core.

Instead, she actually had to face a viable opponent, and given the current political climate in the country, Scott Brown was the right guy, in the right place, at the right time.  He has that most important element working for him.  Momentum.  And, it came at just the right time.  Not too early…not too late.  Nearly every poll, save the Boston Globe’s, has shown Brown gaining on Coakley.  First fifteen points…then ten…then five…then two…and now a dead heat by nearly every account.

It makes sense, as both candidates are emblematic of the political fire that is burning in the country right now.  It’s almost like a steel-cage death match.  Coakley, the entrenched pol, steadily climbing the ladder for years, but with a career blemished by bad plays and deal-making.  Brown, on the other hand, the consummate every-man.  Two decades in the National Guard, a family man, still driving an old pick up truck with 200,000 miles on it.  Speaking with conviction about what people want to hear.  Smaller government, “no” to the health care bill, “no” to increased government spending, “no” to the massive over-reaching that is becoming the moniker of the Obama administration.  He answered David Gergen, who moderated a much publicized debate between the two, that the race was for, “not Kennedy’s seat, not the democrat’s seat, but the people’s seat…”.  This line went instantly into the campaign-line Hall of Fame, along with Reagan’s famous “I paid for this microphone” line from his Presidential campaign.  Gergen, of course, made it easy.  Deeming himself “neutral” but then asking Brown about Roe v. Wade then asking Coakley about her favorite sandwich, the questioning was typically stacked in one sides favor.

Still, Brown will have to take it by a wide margin, to off-set the attempts that will be made by corrupt forces to shape the outcome of this election.  Let’s not forget, this is a State House with more convicts than most prisons.  Only Chicago conjures up quicker images of political corruption than Massachusetts, and Chicago doesn’t hold a candle to Massachusetts in my opinion.  The Big Dig itself is an internationally recognized hallmark of graft, payoffs and corruption.  The state is second only to Vermont in their absolute repudiation of any attempt to capture and convict child-rapists.  Coakley herself, though she has campaigned as one who is tough on child predators, has been benign when it comes to protecting children.  Indeed she was implicit in protecting a police officer who was convicted, finally, of sodomizing his own niece with a curling iron.  She spent weeks in the burn unit at Children’s Hospital.  Coakley has been at odds with Rep. Karyn Polito and Wendy Murphy, two of only a small handful of Massachusetts politicos who have faced the problem of child predators head on.

Martha Coakley, decent person though she may be, is out of step with average Americans.  Like her political counterparts, she just doesn’t get it.  People have had it.  We’re rising up.  It’s not going to be business as usual anymore. Real hope and change is coming, I expect in the mid-terms this year, only it’s not “slogan hope” it’s the real deal.  Change?  Oh, yeah…change is coming.  We’re going to “change” back to a government that reflects the desires and wishes of the majority of Americans, not the few.  A government that will stop and lend an ear to folks whose parents and grandparents wore, or maybe died wearing, a uniform for this country.  We can have compassion for the less fortunate, we can open our arms to people seeking a better life, but we can also expect them to understand that there are citizens who would like their voice heard as well, maybe even….gulp…first.

Win or lose Scott Brown will be a household name from this point forward.  Like Sarah Palin early on, he has captured the imagination of many.  And how refreshing, at least for me, to have someone capturing my imagination for a change, instead of simply straining it.

GONE WITH THE WIND

January 11th, 2010

“Frankly, Scarlett, I don’t give a damn!”  Yes, and in this rendition of the timeless classic, “Scarlett” is code for about seventy percent of the country and it is our President making the strident exclamation.  “Blunder Road” might be the title of the musical analogy for the Obama Team.

The handling of the terror-attempt over the skies of Detroit is just another example of the incessant fumbling that is quickly becoming the trademark of this President.  A delayed and somewhat cavalier response to the initial event on Christmas Day, followed by an even longer delay in returning with a more forceful performance.

And it is a performance, make no doubt about it.  It is becoming increasingly clear that this President is a fine speaker, but there’s not a whole lot more than that when you peel back the layers, or rather, as events peel back the layers for us.  Yet, we learned this about him long ago.  His first foray onto the campaign trail left audiences weak and starry-eyed.  And why not, because as we look back now, we see that both the speeches, and the promises made in them, were larger-than-life.  Worse than that, really.  They were pure fantasy.

Oh, how we tortured George H.W. Bush for his “read my lips” line which had become the hallmark of his campaign, and when circumstances later forced less enjoyable news to pass from those same lips, he was skewered by the Press.  And yet that renegotiation of a campaign promise seems like child’s play now.  This President as left campaign rhetoric so far behind, even the Hubble Telescope can’t find it no.  Yes, gone with the wind are the campfire songs that promised “change” and “hope” and “transparency” in government.  The promise of “no more earmarks” and Congressional jockeying being covered live on C-Span.  The halcyon days of simply making promises and effectual speeches are long gone now, replaced with a legislative bulldozer that simply tramples everything in it’s path, and dismisses as ignorant or racist, any disagreement with the Obama philosophy.

You know things are bad for Obama when his number one sycophant, the abominable Nancy Pelosi, slides in a barb about the President, when questioned about the closed-door dealings of Congress and the campaign promise that those things weren’t going to happen anymore, says “he said a lot of things  during the campaign…”.  Then again, she was so taken aback by the question that she almost fell over, and she may well not remember saying it.  It’s one of few things she has ever said that I remember, because I am usually so stunned while watching any news video of her, that I don’t even hear what she is saying.  I find it increasingly marvelous that so many undesirable traits and mannerisms managed to coagulate in one person.  She looks and acts more like a creature one would find nibbling on cheese in a basement, than she does a person who is only slightly less powerful than the President.  How….HOW…does such an insipid, diminutive, shell of a human being ascend to such a position?  Constantly impatient with us stupid-folk who are so concerned with a reliably inept government taking over a tenth of the country’s economy, and borrowing a trillion dollars to do it.

Janet Napolitano, too entrenched in her own dream to resign after announcing, with a straight face, that “the system worked” in the wake of a suicide bomber travelling half way across the globe with an explosive in his underwear.  Someone who was on a red flag list and a known danger.  Janet, whose own hairstyle should have been the first warning sign that there are some slow moving returns on the radar scope of that brain, had she a shred of dignity, would have spared Obama having to take the sword for her.  They sent her out to try and launch that line.  When it doesn’t fly, you take the cyanide.  Then again, we’re talking about a woman who looks like “Thing 3″ from Cat in the Hat.  Honestly, there just has to be a screw loose there.

Sadly, there is much at stake.  The future of the country, for one thing.  A livable future for our children and grandchildren comes to mind as well.  What is more disturbing about this President and his followers, though, at least to me, is the way they love to dismiss the rest of us as too stupid to know what’s good for us.  A little humility would go a long way, yet there is not a single person on that staff who even knows the meaning of the word, much lass has a grasp of that concept.  Maybe it’s best, because I would hate to see the movement that is afoot, to save this country, fizzle and die because we think things are getting better.  The mid-terms are getting close, Obama and his Flying Monkeys are going to want us to doze off in a field of poppies, sleeping quietly as snowflakes touch our face, while they finish their work of dismantling the Constitution and arranging civilian trials in this country for every two-bit thug that has killed, or wants to kill, Americans.  Don’t do it.  This is no time to let up.

TWIN TOWS

January 4th, 2010

You’re probably thinking this is a confession-type piece, finally coming clean about my foot deformity, but no, that would have been spelled “toes”.  This is a reflection-type piece, in keeping with the New Year, as sometimes it is worth a glance back, even while considering the future.

Our local newspaper, The Cabinet, ran a photo a few weeks ago of a local ski hill called “Twin Tows”, named after it’s two…count ‘em…two…rope tows.  The picture had been taken in 1964 by the late Bernice Perry, also a New Hampshire treasure.  Twin Tows was a treasure, one of many smaller ski hills that used to be a staple across New Hampshire.  I was fortunate enough to have grown up just several hundred yards from the top of this venerable hill, and it was an integral part of my childhood.

This particular picture showed a crowd of several hundred, which was not unusual on the weekends.  There was night skiing, too, on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and tickets were $1.00, daytime or night time.  There was a small warm-up hut at the bottom, a small snack bar with hot dogs, hot chocolate and the like, and a small rental shop.  Looking back, it was very Norman Rockwellesque.  A place where folks from the surrounding communities gathered for good, healthy fun.  Even a few prominent skiers got their start here, including Steve Lathrop of Amherst and George Frost.

Grooming the slopes did not include any fancy Sno-Cat, just a row of us kids, side stepping the entire hill.  Just that part would kill me now.  And my kids?  Unless the grooming can be done with a remote…

The rope tow was a monument to Yankee ingenuity in itself.  The brainchild of Arthur Hodgen and the late John MacDonald, both of Wilton, NH.  Buick motors, if I remember correctly, and wheel rims for pulleys, tacked to the top of a telephone pole.
Safety procedures at the top of the tow included either John or Arthur grabbing your ankle if you became somehow attached to the rope and were heading for the inner workings of the engine house.  You know what they say about watching sausage being made.

Learning the nuance of rope tow riding took some time, too.  Grab too fast and it would pull your arms right out of their sockets.  You had to slowly increase your grip until you started to move, and then hold tight.  Take too long increasing your grip, though, and your mittens will be on fire in no time.  Then there is the matter of keeping your skis in the tracks, as a single ski shooting off in one direction, while being pulled by a Buick-powered rope, can give your groin muscle a lightning strike, so to speak.

It was some place.  More memories than I could shake a ski pole at, and friendships forged there that still endure today, some forty five years later.  It’s sad, that as a culture, we have litigated ourselves into a corner where such a place could never exist today.  Insurance companies would buckle over in laughter at the very proposal of insuring such a place.  That’s too bad.  These places were priceless, they served their communities in many ways, and are generally a part of New Hampshire that I miss.